Do Cities Really Need Those Stadiums for Professional Athletic Teams?

No, they don’t, argues Steve Greenhut, an astute commentator on the misuse of eminent domain and the author of a book on that subject. This time, his dispatch comes from Sacramento where a highly touted plan for a downtown basketball stadium has just come a cropper. Steve Greenhut, Sacramento Is Fresh Victim of Bad Stadium Deals, Bloomberg.com, April 16, 2012 – click here.

It seems that assorted city mothers cling to a childlike belief that stickig local taxpayers for the cost of building a stadium (and associated infrastructure) for billionaire owners of professional athletic teams will revive the city. But  these deals mostly revive the contents of team owners’ wallets, not cities. Nonetheless, city hall denizens, like Charlie Brown who every fall believes that this time Lucy will hold the football for him, so he’ll be able to kick it and not fall on his little keester, believe that this time for sure the deal will do wonders for their city. It’s sort of like 17th century physicians who bled their patients and when those patients grew weaker, the bled ‘em some more.


The purpose of this blog is to provide a forum for people, whether eminent domain professionals or not, for exchange of ideas and a discussion of eminent domain news and issues. It does not provide legal advice. Questions concerning actual cases should be directed to the readers' own legal, appraisal and real estate advisers.

We reserve the right to delete comments that in our judgment are abusive or otherwise inappropriate, or that digress from the topics that are the subject of this blog.