Calling All Grand Central Junkies!

Today’s New York Times reproduces the special 16-page 1913 section devoted to the opening of the Grand Central Terminal, and it’s available on line. We haven’t pored through it yet, but we figure it’s bound to have some interesting factual tidbits. Click here.

If nothing else, it bears reminding one and all that the original design of Grand Central called for the construction of a 20-story tower atop the terminal, so it had to be designed and constructed to accommodate that tower, which cost a pretty penny. So why — according to SCOTUS — didn’t the Penn Central Company have distinct (or reasonable) investment backed expectations to build atop the terminal eventually? A fortiori, by the late 1970s, when the Penn Central case was litigated, the terminal was surrounded by skyscrapers so it was unreasonable on its face to deny Penn Central the right to build as all others around it, and in a way that was expressly contemplated when the terminal was originally built.


The purpose of this blog is to provide a forum for people, whether eminent domain professionals or not, for exchange of ideas and a discussion of eminent domain news and issues. It does not provide legal advice. Questions concerning actual cases should be directed to the readers' own legal, appraisal and real estate advisers.

We reserve the right to delete comments that in our judgment are abusive or otherwise inappropriate, or that digress from the topics that are the subject of this blog.