The Everglades Deal in Trouble

March 8th, 2010

A while back we noted that there was a snake in paradise insofar as Florida’s highly touted deal to save the Everglades through a massive purchase of land was concerned (The Everglades — Your Tax Money at Work, see  http://gideonstrumpet.info/?p=301 )

Now, it turns out that the problem is much bigger than we could imagine. Today’s New York Times reports on the front page, above the fold, that the Evergaldes matter has grown more complex and messier. See Don Van Atta, Jr., and Damien Cave, Deal to Save Everglades May Help Sugar Firm,  N.Y. Times, Match 8, 2010, at p. A1.

This is a huge article, taking up two pages, chock full of details involving everything from budgetary constraints to local politics, so it doesn’t lend itsef to concise abstracting, at least not at the moment — though we intend to go through it again, and add to this post as may be appropriate. But we recommend that if you have an interest in government land acquisition, whether by eminent domain or otherwise, you read this article for yourself in its entirety.

Suffice it to say for now that according to the New York Times charges have been made that the appraisals for the state’s purchase of the subject land use erroneous figures based on comparable sales from 2004 to 2006, to update the appraisal down to 2009. The difference between those figures and the ones produced by another firm of (New York) appraisers comes to close to $400 million.

Then there is the matter of the cost of restoration. Quoth the Times:

“Paying for the land was only the beginning. A slide show prepared by the [South Florida Water Management] district on restoration projects and construction detailed one estimate that put the effort at $8.6 billion and another at $12.3 billion, according to records obtained by the New York Tines.”

And so it goes.

There is bound to be more on this one, so stay tuned.

Follow up. For a discussion of this topic on the Volokh Conspiracy blog, go to http://volokh.com/2010/03/08/saving-the-everglades-or-saving-us-sugar/comment-page-1/#comment-767580

For additional commentary on this news item see Holly Doremus, Conservation Deal Just a Sugar Fix?, Legal Planet, March 8, 2010; go to http://legalplanet.wordpress.com/2010/03/08/conservation-deal-just-a-sugar-fix/

Yo’ Gummint at Work

March 7th, 2010

Times Square Redevelopment – Failure of Government Planning, Success of the Market

March 6th, 2010

Justice at Last: Frank Kottschade Settles his Inverse Condemnation Lawsuit for $3.9 Million

March 4th, 2010

Urban Redevelopment In Action

March 3rd, 2010

Requiem for Clean Water? Not Really

March 3rd, 2010

“Freeway Cap” Parks — La-La Land Is at It Again

March 1st, 2010

High Speed Rail in California — More Problems

February 28th, 2010

Posthumous Justice for Wayne Hage

February 26th, 2010

Is “Central Planning” Behind Urban Redevelopment?

February 25th, 2010

The purpose of this blog is to provide a forum for people, whether eminent domain professionals or not, for exchange of ideas and a discussion of eminent domain news and issues. It does not provide legal advice. Questions concerning actual cases should be directed to the readers' own legal, appraisal and real estate advisers.

We reserve the right to delete comments that in our judgment are abusive or otherwise inappropriate, or that digress from the topics that are the subject of this blog.